A special bench of the Lucknow bench of the Allahabad High Court hearing the Ayodhya title suit yesterday rejected revision petitions filed by one Dr Mohammad Ismail Farooqui urging the court to review its judgement of September 30, 2010.
The special bench comprising Justices Mohammad Rafat Alam, Sudhir Agarwal and V K Dikshit rejected three petitions of Dr Farooqui for the review of the judgement in the title suit.
The court today ended the contempt petitions against a national news agency and a daily newspaper for reporting on the Ayodhya title suit trial in 2006. However, the court had imposed Rs 1000 each as cost on the editor and reporter of the news agency along with the Chief Editor of the newspaper.
The special court also ended the contempt proceedings against two authors and a printer for their controversial book on the Ayodhya excavations. The three were let off after the court penalised them with Rs 1000 each as cost. (United News of India)
The special bench comprising Justices Mohammad Rafat Alam, Sudhir Agarwal and V K Dikshit rejected three petitions of Dr Farooqui for the review of the judgement in the title suit.
The court today ended the contempt petitions against a national news agency and a daily newspaper for reporting on the Ayodhya title suit trial in 2006. However, the court had imposed Rs 1000 each as cost on the editor and reporter of the news agency along with the Chief Editor of the newspaper.
The special court also ended the contempt proceedings against two authors and a printer for their controversial book on the Ayodhya excavations. The three were let off after the court penalised them with Rs 1000 each as cost. (United News of India)
The first inquiry into the demolition of the Babri mosque on December 6, 1992 was completed within seven days. On the morning of Sunday, December 13, Sharad Pawar, then defence minister, invited a group of friends and colleagues to the home of an associate MP. He watched a film - live footage of the whole episode, taken by some government agency, possibly intelligence. Those antique reels should still be somewhere in the archives. There was little that any inquiry committee could have added about the sequence of events on December 6 that ended with the fall of the mosque by the evening.
The causes of this historic event were also a matter of public record. L K Advani's rath yatra was not a surreptitious journey. Indeed, extensive media coverage may have been part of the purpose, since he wanted to create mass momentum for his political project. Neither was there any secrecy when Congress laid the foundation stone of the temple to Lord Ram in the middle of the 1989 polls. Babri was a central theme, along with Bofors, of those dramatic elections. The 1989 BJP versions of Varun Gandhi were full-throated, not muted, in their slogans as parties sought votes with a rhetoric that has been subsequently banned: Mandir wahin banayenge! and Mussalman ke do sthaan, Pakistan ya kabristan! No one hid anything: We shall build a temple on that precise spot! Muslims have two options, either Pakistan or the graveyard!
Democracy is a volatile game played in the open. What was there left to inquire into?readmore Equality is a right, not a favour for Muslims Does Justice matter after 17 Years?
No comments:
Post a Comment