Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz’s Showtime Reveals Skeletons in theUMNO'S Closet

 

Sankara rubbished Nazri’s call for an RCI. - File picDatuk Seri Nazri Aziz’s arguments have failed to justify the need for an inquiry on the sex video allegedly featuring Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, his lawyer has asserted.

OUR UMNO RESPONSE TO A SCANDALOUS MESS IS NEAT AND CATEGORISED. CASH AND SEX ARE THE NORTH AND SOUTH POLE OF MASS INTEREST, EACH WITH A SPRAWLING MAGNETIC FIELD. WE DIVIDE THE HEMISPHERES WITH THE EQUATOR OF LOGIC. CASH AND CORRUPTION ARE THE PRESERVE OF POLITICS. SEX IS THE PROVINCE OF GLAMOUR. WE REFUSE TO RECOGNISE ANY CROSS-OVEREVIDENCE.

MEANWHILE, ENJOY THIS WONDERFUL RENDITION OF I WILL ALWAYS LOVE YOU FROM ZIANA ZAIN. ROSMAH MANSOR CANNOT MATCH OR PEGANG LILIN TO ZIANA VOCAL PROWESS LA. MAYBE SHOULD TAKE SINGING LESSONS FROM ZIANANAZRI, IN TAKING A SWIPE AT NAJIB, SAID THOSE WHO ARE PRIME MINISTER MUST HAVE HIGH MORAL STANDARDS. “CAUGHT IN THE ACT OF ADULTERY” WITH ZAINA ZAIN IN PORT DICKSON, WHICH IS ACTUALLY A SMOKESCREEN!! NAJIB HAD INDEED BEEN CAUGHT WITH THAT ACTRESS, BUT NOT IN PORT DICKSON BUT IN A HOTEL IN KUALA LUMPUR. NAJIB’S SPECIAL BRANCH OFFICERS HAD INSERTED THE STORY OF IT BEING IN PORT DICKSON IN ORDER TO LAY THE GROUND FOR HIS ALIBI AND IT HAS NOW BEEN CONVENIENTLY COVERED UP AND THE BLAME PLACE ON HIS UNDERLINGS IN THE ARMY!!

“I DON’T TALK ABOUT MORALITY. WE DON’T PREACH. WE DON’T ASPIRE TO BE PRIME MINISTER. THOSE WHO ASPIRE TO BE PM MUST SHOW HIGH MORALS.

THE REAL BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY IS TO ACT AS THE BAGMAN FOR ROSMAH MANSOR, THE WIFE OF THE PRIME MINISTER.

Nazri, in taking a swipe at Najib, said those who are prime minister must have high moral standards. "caught in the act of adultery" with Zaina Zain in Port Dickson, which is actually a smokescreen!! Najib had indeed been caught with that actress, but not in Port Dickson but in a hotel in Kuala Lumpur. Najib’s special Branch officers had inserted the story of it being in Port Dickson in order to lay the ground for his alibi and it has now been conveniently covered up and the blame place on his underlings in the Army!! Nazri said

“I don’t talk about morality. We don’t preach. We don’t aspire to be prime minister. Those who aspire to be PM must show high morals.

Melayu jenis apa 
Islam Syiah punya kah ? 

A Chief Editor of a mainstream newspaper who had an affair with a young girl while his wife lay paralysed in bed – Zam himself. 

A Chief Minister who eloped to Thailand to secretly marry his second wife – Muhammad Mohd Taib (then Chief Minister of Selangor). 

A Federal Minister who was caught with a female artiste in a Port Dickson hotel room – Najib Tun Razak (Defence Minister) and Ziana Zain. 

A Federal Minister whose brother was arrested for drug trafficking – Muhyiddin Yassin. 

A Federal Minister who had an affair with someone else’s wife that eventually resulted in a broken marriage – Ruhaini Ahmad. 

A Chief Minister who had an affair with someone else’s wife that eventually resulted in a broken marriage – Muhammad Mohd Taib. 

A Chief Minister who had an affair with an under-aged girl – Rahim Tambi Chik (then Melaka Chief Minister). 

A Chief Minister who had an affair with a girl who eventually gave birth to an illegitimate child – Shahidan Kassim (Perlis Chief Minister). 

A Chief Minister who kept an under-aged mistress at a condominium in Kuala Lumpur – Shahidan Kassim. 

A religious leader who had an illicit affair and who is now holding a prominent position in a very important government religious body - Ismail Ibrahim of the National Fatwah Council. 

A Chief Minister who had an affair with his sister-in-law who have birth to an illegitimate child – Abu Hassan Omar (then Selangor Chief Minister).

2007 – OK you want to talk in English I change my mood. – MR Pukimak who raped Indon maids at home In detail please contact Datok Rocky. Wikileaks. 

2007-2008 _ Chief minister of Kedah – Mahadzir having affair with UMNO puteri, Shahanim.

 Datuk Seri Nazri Aziz’s arguments have failed to justify the need for an inquiry on the sex video allegedly featuring Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, his lawyer has asserted.

.Anwar’s defence counsel Sankara Nair joined other lawyers in rubbishing Nazri’s call for a royal commission of inquiry (RCI), saying that the de facto law minister appears to be “delusionally” fixated that the man in the sex video was Anwar even though the PKR de facto leader has himself denied being the man in the grainy 21-minute black-and-white video clip.

The police have also yet to complete investigations on the case.

“By his (Nazri’s) statement to you he appears to be delusionally fixated that all he speculates about is true when there is nothing to support it. Stretching every fictional muscle to justify an RCI.

“Hence it’s abundantly clear that the primary aim is political — to politically smear Anwar,” charged Sankara today.

Elaborating further, he explained that it is not an offence under the Penal Code to engage in sex with a prostitute.

“To add to what the other lawyers have said under the Penal Code, solicitation for prostitution must be for money and the offence is against the prostitute,” Sankara told The Malaysian Insider, in reference to points made by several lawyers earlier today against Nazri.

The lawyers have insisted that prostitution is not illegal in Malaysia though soliciting for sex is, saying that the de facto law minister would be challenged to prove his case even following the standard criminal procedures.

According to Sankara, the only crime committed was the public screening of the sex video by the “Datuk T” trio — former Malacca Chief Minister Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Thamby Chik, businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah and Perkasa treasurer-general Datuk Shuib Lazim.

The three have claimed responsibility for the video, saying they screened the video to show “a man who wants to be prime minister is not qualified.”

Section 372 (1) of the Penal Code states that it is only a crime if a person “sells, lets for hire... procures, buys or hires or otherwise obtains possession of” any person with the intention of employing, or using that same person for the purpose of prostitution.

The section states that it is also a crime to utilise “deceitful means” to assist in bringing a person in Malaysia for the purpose of prostitution.

Sections 372a and 372b state that it is a crime to live off the earnings of the prostitution of another person and it is also against the law to solicit for the purpose of prostitution.

The Penal Code does not say that it is illegal for an individual to engage in sex with a prostitute in Malaysia.

Sankara said that Nazri’s justification in calling for an RCI was “riddled” with holes and Nazri was “clutching at straws”, adding that the Umno lawmaker himself was not fully “conversant” in Malaysian law.

“By making such unfounded assumptions Nazri, as we say amongst lawyers, ‘can’t see the wood for the trees’.

“It’s shocking that this is coming from a man who is legally trained and was once a practising lawyer,” said Sankara.

The former Special Branch police officer-turned-criminal lawyer said that it would be difficult to even prove that the woman in the video clip was indeed a prostitute, and besides that there was also no proof that the man in the video was Anwar.

“Can Nazri and the Inspector-General of Police show where in section 292 of the Penal Code and the Film Censorship Act that state that to commence prosecution the sections require the proving of authenticity of any X-rated video and to verify identity of the actors?

“Clearly, there is no such requirement. If so why are Nazri and the IGP acting beyond the law by seeking authenticity and identity. Are they now a ‘law unto themselves’? The perpetrators have even admitted to the act. Why the reluctance to prosecute but instead embark on a frolic to politically assassinate Anwar?” said Sankara.

Nazri had said that an RCI was needed to determine whether an act of prostitution took place in the recently-released sex video that allegedly features Anwar.

Nazri said it is a crime to patronise prostitutes for sex.

The minister in the Prime Minister’s Department said the RCI was also needed to determine whether or not the man in the video was the de facto opposition leader.

“Prostitution is illegal in Malaysia. If you participate, or you are aiding and abetting in prostitution, if you patronise prostitutes for sex, this is a crime.

“The RCI would be to determine the identity of the man in the video and of the woman he was having sex with, whether she was a prostitute,” Nazri toldThe Malaysian Insider.

The minister also said an RCI on the sex video was necessary to satisfy public interest.

“If the public is satisfied with the findings, then there would be no need for the RCI. But if there is an element of doubt, then RCI is needed.

“RCI is needed for anything of public interest, to clear up any issue of public interest,” Nazri said.

But the de facto law minister cautioned that the RCI would only be needed if the public was not satisfied with the findings of the ongoing police investigations.

“We have to first wait for the police to complete investigations, to identify the man in the video,” he said.

He said the Cabinet had decided to allow the police to complete the investigations first before pushing for an RCI.

Two weeks ago, a mysterious “Datuk T” had screened a video purportedly showing Anwar having sex with an unidentified woman.

Abdul Rahim , Shazryl and Shuib have claimed responsibility for the video.

A 107-second snippet surfaced on the Internet on Sunday, just two days after police said the video was not doctored.

It made public part of the video that was only screened to select individuals and reporters prior to this but the clip has since been taken down from YouTube for violating the video site’s policy on nudity and sexual content.

PKR has claimed that the clip proved the man in the video was not its de facto leader and repeated its demand that the trio be arrested for pornography.

DAP lawmaker and veteran lawyer Karpal Singh said recently that the “Datuk T” trio could be charged under section 292 of the Penal Code and section 5 of the Film Censorship Act for allegedly distributing obscene material as well as criminal defamation and criminal intimidation.

Raja Petra Kamarudin

What happened on the journey from Cheras to Rawang?

ASP Suresh received some calls on his handphone from persons I subsequently discovered were Dinesh and Deepak. They apparently wanted ASP Suresh to arrange a meeting with me. At first ASP Suresh did not agree to any meeting but finally agreed to meet in a Bak Kut Teh shop in Rawang.

Did you go straight to the Bak Kut Teh shop?

No, we first went to the Kuala Garing area to burn some cables and wires. After that we went to the Bak Kut Teh shop where both Deepak and Dinesh were waiting for us.

What did you discuss?

Deepak started talking to me to try and persuade me to withdraw my 1st statutory declaration. He mentioned to me that there was a red car outside my house in Rawang with military intelligence personnel in it, and that they knew my wife and children were at home.

What was your reaction to this piece of information?

I was very concerned about this as my wife had called me on my handphone while I was on my way to Rawang with ASP Suresh to inform me that there was a suspicious looking red car parked opposite our house and that the persons inside appeared to be watching the house. She had been informed of the presence of this car by a neighbor. I told her to lock the gates and to remain inside.

What else did Deepak say?

He talked to me about the virtues of the present government and what a wonderful woman Rosmah was. He told me he was very good friends with Rosmah and how she visited his shop all the time . He then offered to pay me RM4 million to withdraw my 1st Statutory declaration. I was rather stunned but before I could say anything, ASP Suresh signaled me to refuse this offer. I said I was not interested in money and so Deepak said he could also organize the release of 5 Hindraf leaders in Kamunting, he could arrange for 528 Tamil schools to become fully aided schools by the government, that he could get ASP Suresh’s job back and also give him RM4 million as well. He wanted to take me to Putra Jaya and kept persisting but I refused to go.

What happened next?

ASP Suresh asked Deepak to raise the offer to 5 million and he agreed straight away. He also told me he was willing to organize a monthly payment of RM20,000.00 and that if there was anything else I wanted to put this in writing. He then made a few phone calls on his handphone and then told ASP Suresh to drive me to The Curve near One Damansara Utama.

Were you negotiating with Deepak?

No, I did not say anything. ASP Suresh was doing all the talking and negotiating. I was more concerned with the safety of my family as I did not know what was going to happen to them.

What happened next?

Deepak left by himself leaving his brother Dinesh with us. After about half an hour we all left in ASP Suresh’s car. Dinesh was seated in the front passenger seat and I sat in the rear seat. We reached The Curve about half an hour later. The time now was 11.45 pm.

Why were you going to The Curve?

ASP Suresh told me we were going to meet a VIP there. When we reached the curve I suggested we go to the MacDonald’s restaurant but ASP Suresh said that was not a good idea because there were CCTV cameras there. We then proceeded to the Volkswagen showroom where a Malay gentleman arrived with his pregnant wife and Deepak.

Who was this Malay gentleman?

I did not recognize him. I was just told he was a VIP Datuk. I did however recognize his wife. 

Did you speak to this Malay Datuk?

Yes, I was introduced to him by Deepak. I was very surprised when I realized who he was.

What did this Malay Datuk talk to you about?

He told me he knew I had a family and asked me whether I loved them. I replied saying of course I loved my family. He then told me I should take good care of them as anything could happen to them. He then told me that if I wanted to avoid any problems with my family I should just follow Deepak’s instructions and everything would be OK. He told me I had to retract the contents of my 1st statutory declaration.This Malay Datuk then left immediately with his wife.

What happened next?

Deepak gave instructions to Dinesh to book a room at the Hilton Hotel KL Sentral. I left with ASP Suresh to my house in Rawang to see my wife and explain to her what was happening. I was concerned for the safety of my family. Deepak had informed me he wanted me to retract my 1st statutory declaration and then to immediately leave the country with my family. I was in a state of shock as to what was happening. I had anticipated that I would be arrested and interrogated after releasing my 1st statutory declaration but I did not anticipate my family would be threatened so I was not prepared for this. As this VIP Datuk was also involved, I realized the situation was very serious.

What time did you arrive home after leaving The Curve?

ASP Suresh and I arrived at my house at about 2.00 am that morning. I explained everything to my wife and told her we had to pack up and leave Malaysia that very day, as I had been instructed. I also told her to get ready to go to the immigration department that morning to apply for my children’s passports and to renew hers. I had arranged with a friend of mine called Christopher to pick them all up at 8.30 am and to drive them to the Pusat Damansara immigration department that morning with all their luggage.

Where did you go next?

ASP Suresh then drove me to the site at which he was burning wires where he organized his workers to do the loading onto some 3 ton trucks. We then left for the Hilton Hotel in KL Sentral.

What time did you arrive at the Hilton Hotel?

We reached the Hotel about 3.00 am. ASP Suresh called Dinesh to find out the room number. Both Deepak and Dinesh met us in the lobby and we all went up to the room. I had been told earlier that my family and I would be sent to Hong Kong. I said I was not happy about being sent to Hong Kong and I would prefer to go to Chennai. Deepak agreed to this. He then tried to arrange a private jet for us. This had to be cancelled when it was realized we would have to go through immigration at the airport. Deepak then suggested we go through Singapore by road, then fly to Bangkok en route to Chennai. I agreed. They continued talking to me about the seriousness of my 1st statutory declaration and that I would have to retract it otherwise they could not guarantee anything if the deal failed. Eventually Dinesh left for home to take a nap.

What else did you discuss while in the hotel room?

Deepak was telling me how he had become very good friends with Rosmah from the time she used to visit his shop in Jalan Tuanku Abdul Rahman. He wouldn’t let me sleep as he was talking all the time.

Did anything else happen that morning?

Dinesh returned to the hotel looking refreshed. At about 7.45 am someone delivered a draft copy of the 2nd statutory declaration to the hotel. Deepak went down to the lobby to collect it  after receiving a call on his hand phone. Sometime later a Commissioner for Oaths arrived. He was a Malay man. I was asked to sign this statutory declaration in front of this commissioner for oaths and he attested my signature. He asked me if I knew where his office was and I said I did not. He then told Deepak to make sure he showed me where his office was on the way to the Prince Hotel. I was never given an opportunity of reading the contents of this statutory declaration.

Did you know at this stage that you would be taken to the Prince Hotel?

Yes. Deepak had informed me that he would be organizing a press conference at the Prince Hotel later that morning and that he would make sure a lawyer represented me. He told me not to worry and that I would not have to say anything, just leave it up to the lawyer to talk to the press.

What time did you leave the Hilton Hotel?

About 8.45 am.  Deepak, Dinesh and I left together. I went with Dinesh in his BMW while Deepak went on his own. Dinesh  did not show me where the Commissioner for Oaths office was.

What time did you reach the Prince Hotel?

We arrived at the Prince Hotel at about 9.15 am and drove up the ramp to the car park where we waited for further instructions from Deepak who was apparently downstairs by that time. Eventually Dinesh received a call on his hand phone and he escorted me to a lift which took us down to what looked like a type of lobby on an upper level.

Did you meet anyone in this lobby area?

Yes. Deepak was waiting in this lobby with another Indian man. This Indian man was introduced to me as one Mr. Arunampalam, a lawyer. This lawyer spoke to me and told me to just keep quiet in the press conference arranged for us in the main lobby. He told me not to talk to any of the reporters under any circumstances and that he would do all the talking. Deepak then told Arunampalam to answer not more than 3 questions from the reporters waiting downstairs and handed him a few copies of the 2nd statutory declaration to distribute to the reporters.

What happened next?

At about 10.00 am Mr. Arunampalam and myself took the lift down to the main lobby where we met about 4 or 5 reporters. Mr. Arunampalam talked to them and gave each of them a copy of the 2nd statutory declaration. He told the reporters that I had been forced to sign the 1st statutory declaration under duress and that I now wanted to retract the contents. He would not answer any of the questions the reporters asked him.

Where were Deepak and Dinesh during the press conference?

I think they left the hotel as they did not join us in the press conference.

What happened after the press conference?

Mr. Arunampalam then drove me back to the Hilton hotel in his own car. He dropped me off at the lower lobby and I never saw him again.

Did you at any time engage Mr. Arunampalam as your lawyer to appear in the press conference?

No. I have never met this lawyer before. Deepak was the one who arranged for him to represent me at the press conference. I never told him what to say. All this was arranged by Deepak and not myself.

What did you do once you had been dropped off at the Hilton Hotel?

I went back to the room and knocked on the door. Deepak and ASP Suresh were there. I waited in the room while Deepak was making phone calls to a Ms. Wong who I think was his secretary. She was apparently with my wife and children at the Pusat Damansara immigration centre helping my wife with the passport applications and renewal.

During this period Deepak gave me RM20,000.00 in Hong Kong dollars for my expenditure. He told me he had arranged a tourist van to drive me and my family to Singapore where we were to catch a flight to Bangkok.

What time did you leave the Hilton Hotel?

At about 1.00 pm Deepak received a phone call from Ms. Wong informing him the passports had all been done and so I left the Hilton Hotel in the van with a Malay driver. This van then drove me to the Pusat Damansara immigration centre. The driver was talking to Ms. Wong during the journey and was receiving instructions where to meet my wife and children. When we arrived at the Pusat Damansara immigration centre, I met my wife and children and we loaded all the luggage into the van and proceeded on our journey to Singapore.

What happened when you arrived in Singapore?

The driver stopped at the Malaysian immigration at the causeway and we all had to get out of the van to present our passports at the counter. None of our passports were stamped. We then proceeded across the causeway to Singapore immigration who did stamp our passports. After clearing immigration, we were driven straight to Changi Airport.

What happened at Changi Airport?

I changed some money to get Singapore coins so I could call Deepak to find out about our flight to Bangkok. Deepak told me our tickets were waiting for us at the Swiss Air counter. I proceeded to this ticket counter and collected our tickets. We all caught the evening flight to Bangkok which left Singapore at about 8.00 pm.