MR. ATTORNEY-GENERAL A DAY OF SHAME FOR THE JUSTICE SYSTEM GANI PATAIL AN ASS LICKER

‘an ass licker of the Don’ in English

‘Gani di tootsie lickie’ in Italian

Read more

BOTH FATHER AND SON ARE IN THE WRONG BUSINESS ASSHOLE FOR HIRE ABETTED BY UMNO IN COLLABORATION WITH MAINSTREAM MEDIA

MY FOOT

Read more

COMPLAINANT SAIFUL BUKHARI AZLAN HISTORY OF LIES AND INCONSISTENCIES AND FARAH AZLINA LATIF SEX WITH MOHD SAIFUL‘RUINS CREDIBILITY OF THE THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S CHAMBERS

Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abidin, who led the prosecution team, replied that it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.

Mahatir may be the seasoned politician.Mahatir may be the one writing out all the scripts. And if the Malaysian voters let himin again with even a remote chance, the rape of Malaysia shall continue unabated.

Our present generation was raped since the 1970s. It appears our present children’s generation is also being raped continously today. But the rakyat must ensure the buck stops right in GE13.

All these high-profile shrewed politicians have gained at our expense. If we remain so naive not to know, our children and their children deserve no better than what we had endured. Wake up and KICK em all out in GE13.
watch how Mahatir lie to Malaysian

THIS MAN WAS A “JUDGE” OF MAN, SOME KIND OF JUDGE? NOW HE FACES GOD, THE CREATOR, THE GREATEST EQUALISER, THE ALMIGHTY AND THE SUPREME DIVINE JUDGE OF ALL MEN AND THE UNIVERSE, WHO WILL CONSIDER HIS “CREDENTIALS” (IF ANY) IRRELEVANT! WHAT IS RELEVANT IS HOW HE JUDGED OTHERS. DID HE UPHOLD HIS OATH OF OFFICE WITH IMPARTIALITY, PURE CONSCIENCE, PRUDENCE AND GOOD FAITH? ONLY GOD KNOWS.

RAJA PETRA KAMARUDIN

NOW THAT THE COURT HAS DELIVERED ITS DECISION — THAT SAIFUL BUKHARI AZLAN AND FARAH AZLINA LATIF WOULD NOT BE CALLED TO TESTIFY WITH REGARDS TO THEIR SEXUAL RELATIONSHIP — ALLOW ME TO COME TO THE REAL ISSUE.

YES, THE SEXUAL ESCAPADE BETWEEN SAIFUL AND FARAH IS NOT WHAT I WAS TARGETING AT. THAT WAS ACTUALLY THE RED HERRING TO DRAW THEM OUT AND MAKE THEM RUN ROUND IN CIRCLES IN PANIC. AND, BOY, DID THEY PANIC. PUTRAJAYA WAS SO FLUSTERED THAT EVEN AN ATTACK ON JOHOR BY THE SINGAPORE ARMED FORCES COULD NOT HAVE OUTDONE THAT.

BUT NOW EVERYTHING HAS SETTLED DOWN AGAIN. YESTERDAY, EVERYONE, IN PARTICULAR THOSE IN PRIME MINISTER NAJIB TUN RAZAK’S OFFICE, HAVE BREATHED A SIGH OF RELIEF. WITH THE COURT’S RULING BLOCKING SAIFUL AND FARAH FROM TESTIFYING WITH REGARDS TO THEIR RELATIONSHIP THEY FEEL THEY ARE NOW WELL PROTECTED.

Solicitor-General II Mohamed Yusof Zainal Abidin, who led the prosecution team, replied that it was the discretion of the Attorney-General, as the prosecutor, to charge any person under any section.

The scope of the Attorney-General’s powers in Malaysia has long been a subject of debate and controversy. He is the chief legal adviser to the government and is responsible for advising ministers involved in legal proceedings in their official capacity related article why Gani Patail high ranking officier AG office was not CHARGE for not reporting the crime this is the blunt misuse of power by the B.N’S NAJIB’S SMS

. Fabrication is one of his specialities. Have you read the Unholy Trinity related article it’s mindboggling!Public Prosecutor has deceptively merely manufacturing evidences against Anwar

Anwar Ibrahim’s sodomy trial has been adjourned to tomorrow after the defence raised discrepancies over the charges framed and accuser Mohamad Saiful Bukhari Azlan’s testimony yesterday Remember that infamous judge from Sodomy 1 ? The lawyers want the law to be applied in this trial? Don’t the lawyers know what happen in sodomy 1 ? And what do you think will happen in sodomy 2 ? Correct Anwar will go to jail! All the lawyers can do is prolong the case.If that bugger Augustine Paul was still alive and the judge for the case, he would say it is irrelevant whether there is consent or not. In buggery , consent or not , it is still buggery the learned judge would declare. As long as Anwar does it , it does not matter who he sticks it to whether it is Saiful or Azizan. The time or the place is all irrelevant as far as the case of sodomy is concerned. Anwar did it before. Anwar did it again. Anwar will do it again, and again and again till he can’t get it up. Then the saga ends. Stupid lawyers and judges are sodomising the courts of justice in this country.

AS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SHAME

A TRAITOR IS A TRAITOR, WITH OR WITHOUT A UNIFORM.

Must adjourn …have to ask “Boss Rosma” the next step what to do, cos his got no balls to give out justice fairly & squarely. Maybe even kentut also must ask “Boss ROSMA” can or not…

If the purpose of admitting an out-of-court statement is to prove the truth of its contents then it would fall foul of the common law rule against hearsay. The maker of that statement has to be present in court. Even then it is not the out-of-court statement that is the evidence but the testimony of the witness (maker of the statement).

If the purpose is not to prove the truth of its contents, then it is not hearsay. You may have made an out-court-statement to the police (witness statement) which is inconsistent with your testimony in court and counsel wants to admit that statement into court to prove inconsistency, he may do so. It is not hearsay.In a trial involving sexual offences like rape, the credibility of the accuser is key. If, for example, the victim of the offence had taken four days to report the offence to the police, it casts doubt on the allegation that the sex was forced and not consensual. Rape is defined as penetration without consent. Failure to make a report immediately is not proof that the rape was not committed. It only goes to consent but in a case involving sodomy of course consent is irrelevant. Credibility of the accuser is still key.

Sexual crimes like rape by their nature rarely involve eye witnesses. The credibility of the accuser then becomes key in the defense of the witness. As a general rule character evidence is inadmissible. But if your counsel introduces character evidence then that leaves open for the opposing counsel to call character witnesses to rebut the allegations made against his or her client.

Anwar Ibrahim is not charged under syariah law and the court the blog host attended was not a syariah court. Why then the references to the Koran and the requirements of four eye witnesses etc?

PROSECUTION IS LICKING DRY ROSMA’S PUSSY

by Din Merican

a branch of legal studies called “Critical Legal Studies”
(inspired by Marxism).
We have come up with a Made-in-Malaysia branch called
“Creative Legal Studies” (inspired by UMNO).

John Yoo should use Malaysian examples of “Creative Legal Studies” such as this Saiful case and the Altantunya case in his
lectures at U of California, Berkeley law school.

I can’t say whether DSAI is guilty, but I am sure that:

1. a rape victim will not go into the bathroom as instructed, clean himself, and come out from the bathroom wearing towel. (I think most people will fight the raper off, or just go into the bathroom and lock themselves in it, or try to run out of that house..)

2. the first thing rape victim will normally do is clean themselves because they will feel dirty of the whole act (not waiting for 3 days with the “dirty liquid” in your a*s and even go to the masjid with it!!!!!)Karpal is a seasoned trial lawyer and very clear that the whole case rest upon Saiful Bukhari. Only Saiful knew who and what was shoved up his dirty arse hole. According to the medical report, there was no sign of penetration and Saiful initially claimed it was a plastic bottle. Since Saiful has taken the moral high ground to make an Islamic Oath, he must be tested according to that Islamic yardstick. That’s what Karpal did and suceeded – that if the incident did happen, Saiful the Liar who tries to appear “warak” by performing Friday prayer had actually performed an invalid prayer because he was in a state of impurity. Indeed he was and indeed he is a LIAR that God had warned will be obliterated from the face of this earth!

That compulsive Liar even tries to charade as a pious person by the two black marks that he scratched on his forehead to give that mark of perpetual prostration (tanda sujud di kepala) for his court appearance. It is amazing the theatrics that he puts on, he deserves an Oscar for this performance.

This dirty arsehole story demeans and is a stain on the whole Malay race! especially when you dont even know me. so Ilham dont call anyone stupid it is againt the Laws espoused in the qur’an ok. It is commanded even the most ignorant ones you must have time for them and educate them and discourse with all in a respectful manner ok. dont do it again. tak baik.

for carlos’s”: fair question. I really have to find it. I was referring to having witnessess to a sexual misconduct. in the Miralce of the Qur’an. sexual misconduct has to have 4 witnesess . The Qur’an expressly states an affair outside marriage. for a serious sexual misconduc allegation Allah commands four witnessess to guard against false allegations and wrongdoings against another person and defaming his otherwise good character with ordinary people and wrongly doing so. So I was really thinking of that when I said that. I will do my research. However in this sad case here, it is an allegation of sexual misconduct albeit of the worst kind most frowned upon and unnatural act ( thats about as far as I would go in mentioning it without saying the actual word because I cannot stomachh doing so) and therefore would require the same strict demand by teh Qur’an witnesees to make sure that we do not prosecute wrongly, unfairly and in criminal law beyond reasonable doubt that Anwar has actually perpertrated the said act. Now back to my comment and this is the reason WHY I believe in my heart that the miracle of the Qur’an is also sent from the realm of beyond to guide humans in code of conduct,to live in honor and when judging someone in the courts of Man the laws of man that we do not err and destroy an otherwise innocent persons character and defame him or her. that is why I believe that teh miracle of the Qur’an is also the most comprehensive LEGAL Document of fairness and justice sent to this physical world because God knows the heart of men and the greed of men. and how it can destroy all in its path.

Yesterday, the road to the Courts’ Complex in Jalan Duta was choked. Security was very tight. Entry into the courts was heavily screened as the trial of Dato’ Seri Anwar Ibrahim (DSAI) in Sodomy II started. This is a repeat of the self inflicted embarrassment and humiliation that we, Malaysians, suffered in 1999 as a nation pre-occupied with unnatural sex. We were made out to be like the people of ancient Sodom that God obliterated from the face of the earth.‬
Liwat (Anal Sex)

People of my generation, more so the Malays, have difficulty using the word “anal sex”. There is no Malay equivalent for that word. Being ever so polite and gentle, the Malay word for that is “liwat”. It is derived from the root word “excess/excessive”, as a description of an excessive sex beyond the norms. Even the official dictionary, the Kamus Dewan 1984 version published by Dewan Bahasa could only muster enough courage to define “liwat” as “bersetubuh dengan binatang”.

The Malays could not say “fornicate”, what more to describe the abomination of “anal sex” as “main buntut”. The Indonesians are somewhat a bit more forthright and very open. In their Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia of the 1995 Edition, “liwat” is described as “ persetubuhan sesama lelaki”. The point is that- to the Malays, “liwat” is an animalistic act.‬

And yet, in Sodomy I, the Malays have been internationally scandalised as an animalistic society. Why do I say that? Because, Sodomy I involved the highest strata of Malay society- the Malay (UMNO) Leadership. The charge was brought by a Malay(?) Prime Minister against a Malay Deputy Prime Minister. The alleged victim is a Malay. All the key actors, from the witnesses to the prosecutors and the judges (with one exception the Late Augustine “Not Relevant” Paul) are all Malays. The moral of the Malay society was dragged to its lowest ebb. Even Niccolo Machiavelli of Florence could not be more proud.

If there is anything to redeem Sodomy I, it is the fact that the victim, Azizan Abu Bakar, appeared rather coy, almost like a reluctant performer. Sodomy II, on the other hand, blows the mind away. Here, we have Mohd Saiful Bukhairy Azlan almost proud to claim that his backside was diddled with. When the medical report did not support his story, he went to a mosque in Jalan Duta to make an Islamic Oath under the glare of the tv cameras.

Saiful was intent on having his day in court to show how DSAI could overpower him to have a taste of his backside. In the various press conferences that Saiful Bukhary gave, the mainstream media attempted to make him look like a martyr, like a man seeking justice. And justice for what? For proclaiming to the world that his arse hole was poked!

Saiful’s Day in Court with Karpal Singh

Yesterday and for the next few days, it will be Saiful’s day in court. The day that he exposes the truth in order to seek his justice. But already on the first day of trial, all did not seem well for the prosecution. Saiful met his first test when the contemporaneous evidence in the form of the medical report made on July 28, 2008 at 2pm could not support his story that his arse was buggered. So Saiful took the most convenient suggestion made by Karpal Singh, he accused the Pusrawi Hospital doctor of lying. He accused the doctor of lying for stating that his anus hurt because a plastic instrument had been inserted into it. The next few days will see him accusing a lot more people just to prove that he was indeed buggered.

What is so pitiful is that PM Najib is implicated in this. Saiful has already admitted that just two days before the alleged sodomy, PM Najib had met Saiful. And the person who brought Saiful to meet the PM was none other than Najib’s Personal Assistant, Dato’ Prof Dr Anas. Just ask about anyone in the PM’s Department, and they will tell you what they know of Prof Anas’s sexual orientation! If the Sikhs (we call them Bai’s) were previously unfairly disparaged for this, in the spirit of 1Malaysia, the Malays too are now filling up this quota, a legacy of the NEP.

And Saiful Bukhairy is the kind of witness that AG Gani relies on to form a case against DSAI. Did anyone die? Was anyone blown to pieces? Yet, when it came to Razak Baginda, the central figure in the Altantuya murder, AG Gani was quick to say no evidence to proceed against Razak. Razak has since run away from Malaysian shores, hoping that the public would soon forget him. What is so unfortunate is that the PM Najib is implicated in both these crimes.

The execution of Troy Davis is nothing less than state-sanctioned murder.

Today, the 20th of September 2011, the Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles refused clemency to Troy Davis, giving the green light to his execution by lethal injection tomorrow, at 7pm. If Troy Davis’s execution is carried out, it will shame both Georgia, and the US justice system. Executive clemency is meant to be a fail-safe where the courts have been unwilling, or unable to act. Larry Cox, head of Amnesty International USA, called it“unconscionable” that the board denied Davis relief, adding that Davis was “to be sent to death under an enormous cloud of doubt about his guilt… an outrageous affront to justice.” It is vital that the State of Georgia grant clemency to Troy Davis and halt a wrongful execution. Otherwise, tomorrow, he will be killed. The US judicial system has failed to establish Mr Davis’s guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

I appeal to the Board of Pardons and Paroles to reconsider their decision.

I urge Chatham County District Attorney Larry Chisolm to intervene, and call for a withdrawal of Troy Davis’ death warrant without delay.

READMORE http://thebusinesstribune.blogspot.com/2011/09/mr-attorney-general-day-of-shame-for.html